2021年12月英語六級真題聽力第二套Conversation 1原文

00:00

00:00

MP3下載

https://online2.tingclass.net/puttext/Upload/20240726/CRP-070725xcMyKBNg.mp3

https://image.tingclass.net/statics/js/2012

當提及六級聽力時，尤其是英語六級真題聽力，我們不禁會想起那些考驗英語學習者聽力理解能力的挑戰(zhàn)。作為英語六級考試的重要組成部分，六級聽力部分不僅要求考生能夠捕捉和識別出基本的語言信息，更需要他們在有限的時間內(nèi)對復(fù)雜的語境進行準確理解，并快速作出反應(yīng)。小編為大家整理了2021年12月英語六級真題聽力第二套Conversation 1的內(nèi)容，希望能對您有所幫助！

英文原文

Conversation 1

對話1

Good morning and welcome to people in the news, with me today is Megan Brown, an environmental activist whose controversial new book Beyond Recycling is making headlines.

早上好，歡迎收看新聞人物。今天和我一起的是環(huán)?；顒蛹颐犯げ祭剩H具爭議的新書《超越回收》正在成為頭條新聞。

Hi Brian, thanks for having me today. I'm excited to explain to the audience what my book is really about.

嗨，布萊恩，謝謝你今天邀請我。我很興奮能向觀眾解釋我的書真正講的是什么。

Critics of your book are said that you're trying to force radical changes on the entire country. Some claim that you want to force everyone to eat a vegetarian diet and make private transport illegal.

據(jù)說你書的批評者稱你試圖在整個國家推行激進的變革。有些人甚至聲稱你想要強迫每個人都吃素，并禁止私家車。

I'm aware of those claims but they simply aren't true. People who haven't read the book are making assumptions about my arguments. They know I'm a vegetarian, that I don't wear leather or fur, and that I always use public transportation. So they're depicting me as a radical animal rights activist and environmentalist determined to force my beliefs on others.

我知道這些說法，但它們都不是真的。那些沒有讀過這本書的人在對我的論點進行臆測。他們知道我是素食主義者，不穿皮革或皮草，總是乘坐公共交通工具。所以他們把我描繪成一個激進的動物權(quán)利活動家和環(huán)保主義者，決心將自己的信念強加于人。

But don't you want others to adopt your practices? You campaign for animal rights and the environment for decades.

但你不希望其他人也采納你的做法嗎？你幾十年來一直在為動物權(quán)益和環(huán)境奔走。

I'd love it if people chose to live as I do, but my life choices are based on my personal convictions. They aren't my recommendations for others who don't share those convictions.

如果人們選擇像我一樣生活，我會很高興，但我的生活選擇是基于我的個人信念。它們不是我給那些沒有這些信念的人的建議。

Well, in this excerpt from your book, you argue that meat consumption and private transport are devastating the environment, and that the best choices for the planet are vegetarian diets and public transport.

好吧，在你書中的這一段中，你論證了肉類消費和私家車正在破壞環(huán)境，而對地球來說最好的選擇是素食和公共交通。

I did write that, but those are examples of what I call best practices, not what I'm actually suggesting in my guidelines for saving the environment. I suggest modest changes, like eating vegetarian meals two days a week.

我確實這么寫了，但那是我所說的最佳實踐的例子，而不是我在環(huán)保指南中實際提出的建議。我建議進行一些適度的改變，比如每周吃兩天素食。

You also endorse high taxes on meat and other animal products and increase taxes on gasoline. Those taxes could force poor people to adopt your life choices.

你還支持對肉類和其他動物產(chǎn)品征收高額稅，并提高汽油稅。這些稅收可能會迫使窮人采納你的生活方式。

But the taxes I suggest aren't that high, less than 3% only. Plus, the money generated would be allocated to environmental protection, which benefits everyone.

但我建議的稅收并不高，只有不到3%。此外，產(chǎn)生的資金將用于環(huán)境保護，這對每個人都有好處。

Questions 1 to 4 are based on the conversation you have just heard.

問題1至4基于你剛剛聽到的對話。

Question 1: What do we learn about the woman's new book?

問題1：我們從對話中了解到關(guān)于這位女士的新書的什么信息？

Question 2: What do some critics say about the author of the book?

問題2：一些批評者是如何評價這本書的作者的？

Question 3: What does the woman claim about the diet changes she suggested?

問題3：這位女士對她所建議的飲食改變有何主張？

Question 4: What does the woman say about her suggested tax increase?

問題4：這位女士對她所建議的稅收增加有何說法？