托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作：分組比大組織好

　　AD Do you agree or disagree with following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

　　According to my opinion， it’s always better to be a leader than a follower. True leader show initiative. They take action and they assume responsibility. A leader makes a decision. Some followers may approve of the decision， others may complain about it. However， these followers all chose to follow， not to lead. They chose not to make a decision. That’s how I’m different. I’m not a follower. I want to make the decisions.

　　Good leader will not react to events， but will anticipate them .A leader will start a plan of action and then will persuade others to follow. For example， a class president at a local college may feel that the relationship between the community and the campus is not a good one .The citizens may feel that the college kids make too much noise on the street， litter public areas， and shop in other communities. A good class president will recognize that the community and the campus depend on one another. The president will ask the student body to keep noise down， help clean up the neighborhoods， and work with businesses to attract students. A good leader takes the initiative.

　　Good leaders must be action-oriented. Having taken the initiative， they must see the job though. They have to take charge and lead the followers. They have to motivate and encourage the followers. The followers (in this example， the student body) must understand why good relations with the community are necessary. The followers must be persuaded to do something about it.

　　I enjoy taking the initiative， determining the direction， and being responsible for my actions. I don’t want to suffer through other people’s stupid decisions. If there are going to be stupid ways to do something， let them be mine. Wouldn’t you agree?